- About
- Visiting
- What’s On
- Venue hire
- Catalogues
- Collections
- 101 Treasures of Chetham’s
- Digital Resources
- The Flowers of Histories
- A Book of Hours from France
- The Manchester Scrapbook
- Thomas Barritt of Manchester
- Art Treasures Examiner of 1857
- Manchester Association for Constitutional Order
- The North Western Museum of Science and Industry: Some Reminiscences by Richard Hills
- Criminal Manchester
- The Cup of Destiny
- Athenaeum Souvenir
- Middle English Manuscripts
- Manchester and Liverpool of Today
- Hollingworth’s Mancuniensis
- Memoir of Cecil Wray
- William Seward’s Diary
- The Anti-Monopolist
- Fishwick’s History of Rochdale
- Knyvett’s Defence of this Realm
- Tractatus de Nigromantia
- Axon Ballads
- Printed Books & Ephemera
- Archives & Manuscripts
- Prints and Photographs
- Blog
- Support us
Number One in an Occasional Series of Stuff You Wouldn’t Expect us to Have – Oz: Schoolkids Issue
What is it?
Oz was an underground alternative magazine, originally published in Australia but brought out in London from 1967 until 1973.
What’s its significance?
No. 28, Oz: Schoolkids Issue, became the subject of a high-profile obscenity case conducted at the Old Bailey in the summer of 1971. The issue was edited by 20 teenagers and features a Rupert Bear montage (not pictured!) that resulted in Oz’s editors – Richard Neville, Jim Anderson and Felix Dennis – being charged with “conspiracy to corrupt public morals”.
The trial was the longest under the 1959 Obscene Publications Act and the defence lawyer was John Mortimer, QC, later the writer of the books and TV series Rumpole of the Bailey. The defendants were found guilty and sentenced to up to 15 months imprisonment although this was later quashed on appeal.
How did we acquire it?
Our copy of no 28, came from the collection of Dave Godin, and is available for consultation in the Library. The entire archive of Oz is now available online for anyone to see here. Although we should echo their warning and say that Oz contains explicit language and images that reflect attitudes of the era in which the material was originally published, and that some viewers may find confronting.
